|
Introduction:
Hobart and the Future of Lit (Mags)
"I
was at this airport bar. I wondered what motivated people.
I missed my connecting flight. Things happened."
—the first lines of "Layover" by Kim
Chinquee; Hobart #5
"Our
father laughed and we felt exhaustion in how he propped
his body against our own. We heard thirst in the bobbing
of his throat. We saw age in the whiskers around his
ears and nose, and age startled us, hung us out to dry."
—from
"Age Hung Us Out to Dry," by Ryan Call; Hobart
#8
"You
know that feeling you get when like somebody's trying
to make a point and they say something like, 'it's like
the difference between driving a Kia, and a Lexus...'
and you're like driving a Kia. Or when like somebody
tells you about the worst fucking movie that they ever
saw, and you kind of really loved it. Or like everybody..."
—from an untitled painting by David Kramer; Hobart
#7
Soon
after I began Luna Park, a thick package arrived in the
mail one morning (August 16, 2007) from Ann Arbor, Michigan.
The package didn’t stand out in any way and I tossed
it on the desk next to the others from that week. I had
been receiving review copies of literary magazines for
some time at that point, and the various publications
were scattered throughout the house: next to the lamp
alongside the bed, on the butcher block in the kitchen,
in mini-stacks on the dining room table, tucked in between
back issues of The Nation and Dwell
on the living room ottoman. When I got around to opening
that package from Michigan that evening, I was given my
first introduction to Aaron Burch’s Hobart.
Hobart,
a small literary magazine published almost exclusively
by Burch out of Ann Arbor, was a special magazine for
me—not because it is "better" than any
other literary magazine, because I wouldn't say that it
is. Hobart was simply a literary magazine that
right away spoke to my own literary interests. (I have
found others before and since that do so as well, but
what particularly drew me to Hobart was that
the work Burch published reminded me so much of what I
imagined myself writing, which was almost eerie to encounter;
sort of the magazine as a Lacanian mirror.)
What
Hobart was (and is) for me was an imagined community
such as Benedict
Anderson writes about—which is, I think, a great
part of what literary magazines are good at creating.
Magazines like The
Masses, The
Little Review, the first and second Dial,
Harriet Monroe's Poetry,
Kulchur, Neon, kayak, and many
others were enjoyed so much by readers because they made
it possible for these readers to imagine a world of similar
readers outside of their own community. McSweeney's
does this. So does The
Minnesota Review. So does every magazine discussed
in this issue of Luna Park. Every publication does this
in one way or another. The only thing special about literary
magazines is that they bring together readers by using
literature.
Hobart
publishes great writing—such as, in the most
recent issue, fantastic stories by Benjamin Percy,
Sheila Heti, Lee Henderson, Chris Bachelder, Ryan Call,
and others—but many magazines do that. The writing
in Hobart just seems to be for a reader like
myself, and I think that is saying something. I think
this is something literary magazines do very well, maybe
even better than other such venues. Magazines such as
Partisan
Review and Story
are thought of in such awe because of the great writing
they published and because of the communities
of readers they created because of that.
-Travis
Kurowski
May 15, 2008
|