|
Me,
Reading: My Years at the Antioch
Review
Gary Percesepe

As a boy I would often walk to the Yonkers
Public Library. The library was an imposing structure
that sat high above Broadway in gothic splendor near Getty
Square, at the opposite end of Broadway from where we
lived in south Yonkers, not far from the Bronx. It was
a long walk carrying ten books, the maximum number the
librarian allowed me to check out on my card. Later, I
learned to take the bus.
Looking out the window during these bus
rides I could pick out familiar landmarks: the billboards
we ducked behind to keep from getting clipped in the head
during summer rock fights; the Chinese laundry; the small
park off McLean Avenue with the statue of Lincoln, in
whose shade I would sometimes rest on the long walk home;
the movie theater where I first saw a picture by myself,
a present from my mother on my tenth birthday. I felt
grown-up riding the bus. I was alone, but not lonely.
I had the books for company.
Sometimes I would riffle through the books
on the bus, looking at the pictures or flipping to the
back to see how many pages I would have to read to finish
a book. Finishing was important to me. I never checked
out less than ten books.
What was I reading at ten? Mostly adventure
stories, I suppose. At this age, I was fonder of dogs
than people. I loved Big Red, the indomitable Irish setter,
his friend Danny, and their trapper life in the woods
of Wintapi. Later there was Frank Merriwell, the college
football star, and the Hardy Boys. We fancied ourselves
boy detectives, my friends and I, as we glided through
the woods above the park looking for clues. (Sometimes
on these adventures, away from my friends for a moment,
I stopped to gaze at the blasted rock cliff, lupine and
snapdragons hanging from the walls like garlands. I would
look up at the big stone house on the hill on Prospect
Drive where I was born, and wonder how my family had come
to move. The bare outline of the story, of course, was
familiar to me, though I learned later that, as in most
stories adults told, there were parts missing. After my
grandfather, who owned the majestic house on the hill,
moved unexpectedly to Miami, the house had been sold,
and my parents and their three children had moved to a
cramped apartment on Stanley Avenue, high above the Hudson
River. It was not a happy place. My older brother died
on the street outside that apartment one winter morning.
Thinking about it now, maybe I was doing all that reading
and sleuthing for a reason. Things didn’t add up.
(This is what I would discover later about life: things
rarely did.) Later still, there would be Jack London,
a name I had heard in school. I was big on dinosaurs—someone
had taken me as a kid to the New York Museum of Natural
History to see the theatrical Hall of Dinosaurs, T Rex
and his pals posing in all their bony glory, and I was
hooked. But there were also fat science books, as I recall.
These went unread, left in a pile by my bed. Why did I
take the trouble to cart them home from the library if
I didn’t read them? Beats me. They were there in
the library for me to take, and I took them.
I was conscious of people watching me
on the bus. I would count out my coins carefully and deposit
them in the meter, or hand a dollar to the bus driver
and wait patiently for a stoplight, where he could make
change. The books themselves I stacked one on top of another
in a tall pile, the bigger books on the bottom. I held
them against my hip as I walked, or out in front of me
balanced on my belt buckle when my arms got tired, or
when climbing the bus stairs or the stairs to my apartment.
I always sat in the back of the bus. I carried my books
past strangers, and sat on the side of the bus nearest
the sidewalk. I never spoke to anyone. I preferred to
observe out of the corner of my eye the passing scene,
inside and outside the bus. My dream as a child was to
become invisible. From my seat at the back of the bus,
with no one behind me, I could see the adults but they
could not see me. When the Chinese laundry came into view,
and then the gray stone of Saint Denis Catholic Church,
I would gather my books and get off the bus. It was my
stop.
I shared my room in the apartment on Lawrence
Street with my baby brother, Robert. Our mother had been
pregnant when her eldest son was killed on Stanley Avenue,
and in the remaining months of her pregnancy, from February
to August, she had cried continuously. Bobby (we never
called him Robert) has a middle name, Thomas; he was named
for the older brother he never met. Two years later I
would have another roommate, Douglas Arnold. The new baby
for a time was cared for in my parents’ bedroom;
later he came to live with Bobby and me. Three boys, three
beds, one room. There was a long hallway in the apartment
where my father, a scratch golfer, would practice his
chip shots with plastic balls. My sister Jeanne, the only
girl in the family, had her own room. Pale violet in color
and little larger than a closet, it was located just off
the dining room and to the left of the entrance into the
apartment. It was here that she practiced the mysteries
of girlhood. She was an older sister. I was a little in
awe of her. She had known my older brother; he had died
just after I turned four. The week before his death he
had carried home from the bake shop my birthday cake.
I don’t remember Bobby ever disturbing
my reading in our small bedroom, though it’s possible
of course that he did. Perhaps I read to him, though I
doubt it. Reading has always been a silent, solitary act
for me. In those days I could well imagine that the writers
I admired wrote only for me, an audience of one. This,
despite the fact that the book I held in my hands were
often old and worn, and the pale blue cards on the inside
back covers held the dates that the books had been checked
out by other readers. No matter. I had them now. I was
peculiarly protective of these books. Often, I would ride
the bus back up to the library at Getty Square in order
to renew all ten of them for another two weeks.
Re-reading, Roland Barthes says, is a
lost art, practiced only by the very old and the very
young. Certainly this was true for a time in my family.
My grandmother, who had come to live with us on Stanley
Avenue after the death of her husband (it was the street
of death, to me—I have never returned there), kept
her ancient Italian bible on the night stand in her tiny
room on Lawrence Street. Scraps of paper marked her favorite
passages, mostly in the Psalms. Later in life—in
the year that I lost my father, my teaching position,
a home that I especially loved, and many of the illusions
that had sustained my life to that point, and entered
at last into something resembling adulthood, at the age
of forty—I would turn to those same psalms for comfort
and healing; they became my permanent address.
There was no air conditioning in the apartment.
During the summer months the windows were wide open to
the city below. We lived on the top floor of the three
story building. On the ground floor was an upholstery
shop owned by a Jew named Ira; my father had a second
job—a third if you count his work as a caddy on
Sundays—delivering slip covers for Ira throughout
lower Westchester and the five boroughs of New York. I
would accompany my father on these trips in our old Studebaker.
Someone had stolen the back seat out of the car while
it was parked outside on the street. We stacked the slip
covers on the bare springs, and set out. I was amazed
at my father’s ability to navigate the city, which
seemed to me, as a child, impossibly huge and sprawling,
with wildly different neighborhoods. He would point out
to me the various Midtown landmarks. I especially loved
to look at the Flatiron building, which amused and delighted
me. I got to know Tremont Avenue in the Bronx the way
I knew my own street in Yonkers. Riding shotgun in the
Studebaker, I would read the addresses that Ira had written
out for the day’s deliveries and try to imagine
what adventures awaited us at each place. I loved the
colorful place-names—Flatbush Avenue, Riverdale
Drive, Brunkner Boulevard, Jamaica, Van Wyke, Bensonhurst,
Coney Island, Mulberry Street, Murray Hill, Chelsea—and
the graceful arches of the bridges at night, beaded with
necklace-like lights—Throgs Neck, Whitestone, George
Washington, Brooklyn, Triborough. Each time we passed
it, headed home on the Major Deegan, I would lean out
the window and wave at Yankee Stadium.
I helped install the slipcovers, cramming
sofa cushions into place and zipping the clear plastic
covers closed, sprinkling Corn Starch on them to take
out the wrinkles. I enjoyed these Saturday excursions
with my father; I had him all to myself. Sometimes I would
get a dollar tip, which my father allowed me to keep.
I would promptly spend my tip money on baseball cards,
hoping for a Mickey Mantle or Roger Maris, but settling
for an occasional Tom Tresh or Tony Kubek, and a pile
of useless Washington Senators.
In front of our building was a street
light. At night, with the door to my room open, I would
lie in bed for hours, reading. Our building was on the
corner of Lawrence Street and Saratoga Avenue. Across
the street was Charlie’s, the corner store where
I would buy penny candy and baseball cards with my tip
money. Each night at midnight the corner traffic light
would automatically switch over to a steady flashing yellow.
My room was bathed in this soft, cautionary color. At
night when I couldn’t sleep I would lie in bed and
watch the light flash. I would think about what I had
read, or think about my future, or think about nothing
at all. Time seemed to stretch out between the pulses
of light. The world, in my reading room, seemed impossibly
lovely. Placing my hand on my bare chest, I could feel
my heart beat in rhythm with the light. Outside on the
street, cars were parked in a long silent line, their
grills gleaming. On the dark walls of my bedroom I could
make out the pulsating images of posters I had tacked
up, my clothes hanging bodiless on a hook, the dull gleam
of my school trumpet. And my library books, with their
glossy dust covers, scattered on the bed and floor.
Some years ago I found myself seated on
a plane next to a man I didn’t know from Adam. We
shared a ninety minute flight from LaGuardia airport in
New York City to Dayton, Ohio. At the time, I was a teaching
philosophy at a small, conservative Christian college
in Ohio. A native New Yorker “living in exile,”
I was returning to Ohio from a visit with family in New
York. The guy next to me on the plane was reading a magazine.
Let’s say it was The New Yorker. That might
not have been what he was reading, it may have been some
other literary magazine, but whatever it was, it caught
my attention. I struck up a conversation with him about
literature. And that conversation helped change my life.
It turned out that the man next to me
was also a college professor. What’s more, he told
me, he was the editor of the Antioch Review.
Like I said, I didn’t know him from Adam, but I
knew Antioch.
Antioch College was four miles down the
road from the college where I taught, but it might as
well have been four light years away, that’s how
different Antioch was from the place where I taught. Our
school was the kind of place where you might encounter
Jerry Falwell, a personal friend of our president, preaching
about how God created Adam & Eve, not Adam & Steve,
or joking that the ACLU didn’t like Christmas because
“in that bunch you couldn’t find a virgin
or three wise men.” You get the idea. Sex was preached
about on a regular basis in Chapel, which met every weekday
at 10 a.m.—the basic idea was, “don’t
have any, or we’ll kick you out.” Students
were kept strictly segregated, men in one set of dorms,
women in another. We didn’t have any alumni that
you might’ve heard of. By contrast, Antioch was
a place where you might get up to use the bathroom in
your co-ed residence hall to discover an orgy in progress,
all genders welcome—where you might elect to join
in, or go back to your room to complete an assignment,
or maybe head over to Kelly Hall to hear Harvard paleontologist
Stephen J. Gould or U.S. Poet Laureate Mark Strand or
Clifford Geertz, or another of Antioch’s famous
alums holding forth.
I had a few friends at Antioch on the
faculty. On several occasions I had been invited to campus
to speak. Often enough, it was Al Denman who invited me.
(One night I was asked to speak on “The Death of
God.” “God is dying every day,” I said,
“in the streets of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
under military occupation, in the segregated slums of
South Africa, in the barrios of Central America where
peasants still gather in churches to hear a word of liberation.”
This was not what the Antioch folk had expected to hear.)
Al taught philosophy at Antioch. He had come to Antioch
in 1964 from Boston University, originally as “chaplain,”
back when Antioch still had one, in the way that Yale
had William Sloane Coffin as chaplain in the turbulent
years of the Vietnam War. Al had experienced a crisis
of faith many years before I met him, but still referred
to himself as a “reverent skeptic,” in an
Ingmar Bergman fashion. He was intrigued by my story,
a displaced New Yorker of a liberal bent, working at a
conservative Christian college in Ohio surrounded by corn
fields, and teaching phenomenology and existentialism,
Nietzsche, Marx, and Derrida, to students who listened
appreciatively to Jerry Falwell. Talking to Al, I became
sort of interested myself in how I was pulling this off.
Of course, I didn’t last long at
my college. I found myself unemployed after publishing
a feminist anthology that included the writings of gays
and lesbians. But not before I joined the “staff”
of the Antioch Review, at the invitation of the
editor that I had met on that plane.
Back to the plane: what did we talk about?
We talked about literature, of course, me and my new editor
friend, and about Antioch. I don’t recall telling
him where I taught, though I surely must have. Instead,
I discussed my favorite writers, writers I had discovered
in the pages of The New Yorker and in the “little
magazines” that kept the short story genre alive
and vital. I was a fan of Donald Barthelme, and Frederick,
two brothers whose stories in The New Yorker
had thrilled and delighted me, different as they were—and
I was especially fond of Ann Beattie, Ray Carver, William
Trevor, and Alice Munro. We had a lively discussion about
Ray and the guy who did the editing job on him at Esquire
and Knopf, Gordon Lish, a.k.a. “Captain Fiction,”
in a conversation that eerily resembled the current dustup.
This was fifteen years ago, but even then I had concerns
about the grieving widow and the cottage industry that
was growing up around Ray (who after death had “published”
as much or more as he had in life), not to mention concerns
about Lish. My seat mate was friends with Gordon Lish,
as it turned out, and had published Lish’s new fiction
in the Antioch Review. So, you see, we had a
lot to talk about on the plane.
I had read the Antioch Review
on occasion, had picked it up at the Epic Book Shop in
Yellow Springs, leafing through its pages to see what
fiction was offered, and who the poets were. But I didn’t
know that much about it. So, on the plane I asked a few
questions about the Antioch Review, how it was
faring these days, who he had lined up for the next issue,
and the like. I remember him telling me something of the
Review’s history, how it had started in
the dark days of the second world war, its founding editors,
their vision for the new little magazine in the struggle
against global fascism, and the way it had managed to
endure despite a host of problems, not the least of which
was Antioch itself, a place that seemed always to be in
turmoil. I recall him saying how concerned he was about
the essay form, which seemed to be vanishing. He was very
proud of the Antioch Review’s role in keeping
the essay alive.
We talked our way from New York to Dayton,
and when we landed we exchanged telephone numbers. Some
time later, I found myself for the first time in the office
of the Antioch Review.
The Review at that time was located on
the second floor of the Antioch College library. I walked
in, introduced myself to the managing editor, and looked
around. On one wall were past issues of the Review,
with its distinctive cover art by David Battle. On another
wall were books that had come in from various publishers.
The books were free for the taking, no questions asked,
so long as you promised to write a review. (The Antioch
Review continues its book review section today, long
after many little magazines have abandoned it.) On yet
another wall were hung pictures of famous and not so famous
writers that had appeared in the pages of the Review
over the years, and a small collection of the most god-awful
opening sentences of rejected stories, culled from decades
of submissions, some quite hilarious. Just to the right
of this “wall of fame & shame” there was
a table. On the table sat two plastic containers. In these
containers, stood upright as soldiers, were hundreds of
mailing envelopes of different hues. Each of the envelopes
contained one short story submission. They were arranged
chronologically, from the date they had been logged in
by the managing editor or by Gabrielle, one of the student
interns. This, of course, was the “slush pile”--unsolicited
manuscripts that had come in from all over North America,
Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and the English speaking
world.
I became an “assistant fiction editor”
at the Review, or what is commonly known as a
“reader.” It was a simple job. Every week
or so I would climb the stairs to the Review office, stuff
as many manuscripts as I could fit into a cloth bag that
I carried for this purpose, and carry the stories home
with me, where I would read them. The following week I
would return the rejected stories to the managing editor
with a big circled R on the front of the mailing envelope.
There was a lot of rejection. The Antioch Review
received over 5,000 unsolicited short stories a year.
Of these, we would publish about ten.
In preparation for my work as a reader,
the editor encouraged me to call Nolan Miller. One of
the early editors of the Antioch Review, Nolan
retained the title of associate editor. I didn’t
know it at the time, and only read it after his death,
but Nolan had once written a statement for the Review
that detailed his view of what a “slush pile”
reader should look for in a short story submission. This
statement appears in its entirety in the Winter 2007 issue
of the Review. Here is an excerpt:
What we’re looking for is what
is intriguing—difficult as it is to pin down just
what that means. First of all, I think it’s what
I call “a voice.” The writer has a way of
getting to the reader without getting in the way of his/her
characters or story. The manner as well as the method
is appealing, as interesting or appealing as a person
is who attracts our attention when met for the first time.
That is, some people are immediately likeable; we want
to know them better, to enjoy their company more. They
make us anticipate pleasure to come. An element of surprise
hovers. We don’t know what to expect (what’s
predictable) but we like expecting. This produces a state
of suspense, not only in the possible outcome of the story
but in the continuing “surprise” of the writing,
the fresh imagery, the variations of the sentences which,
like dance steps, “lead” us into patterns
and rhythm we follow in time to persuasive and melodious
music. In the best sense, good writing is very much like
music—the music the writer makes and the reader
hears, not too predominantly, but subtly effecting guidance.
Reading the next paragraph puts me in
mind of countless afternoons spent at Nolan’s side,
in a kind of rolling tutorial, which
I have written of elsewhere, as guest editor of a Mississippi
Review issue dedicated to new fiction, and to Nolan
Miller:
Too many of the stories we get are
told rather than “made.” By this I mean that
in the telling (too much expository writing, too much
descriptive writing) we are too aware of the writer at
work. Like a stagehand, setting the scene. Like a lecturer,
instructing an audience. As a result, the reader is given
no active role. No imaginative leap is made into the “surrounds”
of the story. The reader does not find himself/herself
at the center but is “outside” simply listening
to the writer, simply looking at what the writer is looking
at.
In good weather, I would read stories
out by the pool. We had a lovely redwood house in those
days, built by a Frank Lloyd Wright devotee in the Prairie
style, and surrounded by ten wooded acres. In the pasture
beside the pool, our four horses could be seen grazing.
Our peacocks roosted in the tall trees beside the red
pole barn. In fall and winter I would read in my office.
The house featured a floor-to-ceiling glass window with
a northern exposure; when I tired of reading, I would
lift up my eyes and sometimes see a winter storm approaching.
I kept a fire blazing in the fireplace through the winter
months. The dog often sat at my feet.
Summer vacations, I would take two bags
of stories with me to the beach at Montauk. Once, I had
a friendly note from a writer whose story I had rejected,
trying me again, and commenting about the sand that had
somehow made its way from the beach into her return envelope.
Another time, a rejected writer returned my toothbrush.
Don’t ask.
If I liked a story, I would read it all
the way through to the end. Then I would read it again.
If I still liked it, I would set it aside in the small
“maybe” pile, and return to the big pile stacked
up next to my reading chair. Later, maybe the next day,
or the day after that, I would return to the “maybe”
pile for stories that had stayed with me, whose characters
I could imagine outside the story, who had kept me company
at the beach or during a snowstorm. I would re-read these
stories, scribbling notes on what was working especially
well in the story, what I liked, and why I liked it. Often
enough, a “maybe” story would wind up on the
reject pile. This was the most difficult part of the work.
I learned soon enough that it wasn’t my job to try
to fix the story (though I was sometimes sorely tempted).
Instead, I would scrawl my name on the standard rejection
note that the Review used, with the comment,
“Try me again.” Most writers did. This is
how I came to correspond (if I may use this term) with
the aforementioned Sand and Toothbrush writers. A short
story writer myself, I had a tiny collection of notes
of this kind from Roger Angell at The New Yorker
(minus the sand and toothbrush), including one typed on
what appears to be an ancient typewriter, perhaps once
belonging to E.B. White or (as I’d like to imagine),
Roger’s mother Katherine. Many years later, I learned
that Angell had sent 21 of these notes (“Your writing
shows promise, in the future please feel free to submit
your work directly to me”) to Ann Beattie before
accepting the 22nd story. We live in hope (both writers
and editors).
Thinking back on my years at the Antioch
Review, perhaps this is what I loved best of all—reading
in hope. In hope of hearing a new voice that would thrill
and astonish, or break my heart, or repair the world.
Things end. Just like stories. Relationships
fail. I left the Antioch Review in 1995, after
a terrible row with the editor I met on that plane. Worse,
in recent days the world has learned that Antioch College
itself may come to an end. From its founding in the mid
nineteenth century, Antioch has had a precarious existence.
Ironically, the demise of Antioch College is directly
linked to the creation of its many offspring—satellite
campuses around the country that collectively are known
as Antioch University. (The “flagship” campus
of Antioch University, with a new multi-million dollar
building, is located in Yellow Springs, but not on the
campus of Antioch College. Got that?) For those who love
her, it comes as no surprise that a group of alumni and
former board members are working heroically to save Antioch
College. You can read about their efforts (or send a donation)
here.
The good news is that the Antioch
Review will go on, as it is connected to Antioch
University and not directly to the College. With a circulation
of around 5,000, it continues to end each year in the
red, and each year the University “makes the red
ink go away.” Whether this can be called a “subsidy”
is a matter of interpretation, as is most things Antiochian.
Somehow, the Review goes on publishing.
Some years ago, I published a piece called
“Mr. Seale Goes to Antioch” that explored
the relationship between “the college” and
“the university” in the context of a visit
to Antioch by former Black Panther member Bobby Seale.
Re-reading it a few days ago, I see again how impossible
it is for me to think about the Antioch Review without
also thinking about Antioch College. Already
in that piece, written in 2002, I was lamenting the
possibility of a world without Antioch College, and, I
see now, without the Antioch Review. The existence
of both, it seems to me, is essential to our culture.
These “little magazines,” linked as they often
are to indispensable institutions of higher learning in
our nation, represent the best of what our American culture
has been able to produce in the republic of letters. The
loss of even one of them diminishes us greatly. Nevertheless,
things end. “In the midst of life we are in death.”
The End. As a child I often saw those
two words on the big screen at the movies or on the last
page of the book in my hands. As a reader, I discovered
the same slippage of time on the page as on the screen,
thrown toward the same certain end. I have always been
ambivalent about endings, particularly with stories that
I especially loved. Reading as a child, and then later
at the Antioch Review, the pages fell away as
I traveled through a time that seemed to me, even as a
child, to be so thick—the time of my reading, the
time of the story, the time that expired tick by tick
as I waited—for what I knew was coming, what could
not be prevented, what I had been reading for, yet what
I surely did not want. Our ambivalence toward endings
of every kind is not merely literary, but existential;
it reflects the certain knowledge of the final descent
to our own end. It is dreadful, yet we accept it, embrace
it if we can. Reading is a kind of preparation for death.
This is widely known, though rarely acknowledged.
We cannot claw back fragments from the
debris of time, to make some new beginning or to block
the finality of our own end. All writing that is good
writing does not trick us in this regard, or give us false
hope. What remains is the love, the love that I have felt
for writers, many of them encountered in the pages of
the “little magazines” such as the Antioch
Review, for the characters they brought into this
world through these long years, against all odds; for
the many gifts they have given me, and for opening in
me the capacity for pure, oceanic feeling. For helping
me to develop a capacity to give and to receive love,
and for making me more nearly human. This is why I read:
To feel that I am alive and that I am not alone.
Thinking back on my reading life I realize
how stories written by people I did not know opened my
mind and my heart to receive the beauty and goodness that
this world has to offer. Worlds upon worlds, there for
me.
What world is this? What kingdom? What
shores of what world?
I am grateful.
The stories that I read were not perfect
but they were my friends. I didn’t ask for perfection,
only company. Some I will go back and re-read, some never.
I will remember characters in these stories that I have
known, writers whose work I helped publish, remember also
those who have lent me books and those to whom I have
given books, those I wrote for and those who wrote for
me, and they will remind me in some mysterious way of
how it was with me, long ago, alone in my bed on Lawrence
Street, under the flashing light. Me, reading.
There
is not a single day that my heart cannot find them.
Gary
Percesepe worked as assistant fiction editor at Antioch
Review and was guest editor twice at Mississippi Review.
He has published his poetry and stories in many magazines,
online and off.
|